Angelica M Loreto v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al.

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Angelica M Loreto, No. CV-22-00269-TUC-JAS (MSA)

10 Plaintiff, ORDER

11 v.

12 Arizona Board of Regents, et al.,

13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 16 Magistrate Judge Aguilera that recommends denying Defendant Arizona Board of 17 Regents’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 62; see also Doc. 57.) A review of the 18 record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and 19 Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. Therefore, the Court will not 20 consider any objections or new evidence. 21 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s 22 recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 23 Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. 24 Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 25 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 26 (1) Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 62) is accepted 27 and adopted. 28 (2) Defendant Arizona Board of Regents’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 57) 1 is denied. The Parties are directed to Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s Report and 2 Recommendation for a more detailed explanation. 3 (3) Consistent with Doc. 49, the parties shall file a Joint Proposed Pre-Trial Order 4 within 30 days of this Order. 5 6 Dated this 18th day of November, 2025. 7 8 A ashe. Honorable James A. Soto 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-