Angel Alejandro Carmona v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Opinion
O
ANGEL ALEJANDRO CARMONA, Case No. 2:25-cv-05280-SVW-KES
Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION OF U.S.
Respondent.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 10) and the other
records on file herein. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those
portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections (Dkt. 12) have
been made. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the
Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the
Petition with prejudice.
As a federal prisoner proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Petitioner is not
required to obtain a certificate of appealability (“COA”) in order to appeal to the
United States Court of Appeals in this case. See Harrison v. Ollison, 519 F.3d 952, 958 (9th Cir. 2008) (holding that the plain language of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) does not require federal prisoners bringing § 2241 petitions to obtain a COA in order to appeal, unless the § 2241 petition “is merely a ‘disguised’ § 2255 petition”); see e.g., Tomlinson v. Caraway, No. 14-cv-020094-VBF-KK, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131448 at *2, 2014 WL 4656432 at *1 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2014) (adopting report and recommendation and noting that petitioner in federal custody was not required to obtain a COA to appeal the denial of his § 2241 petition).
DATED: November 19, 2025 □□ (GEOR ll STEPHEN V. WILSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Angel Alejandro Carmona v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Angel Alejandro Carmona v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.