Andrews v. State
153 So. 3d 990, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 174, 2015 WL 73722
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Andrews v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16179 →
Opinion
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus because the circuit court has recently granted petitioner leave to amend his pending motion for post-conviction relief. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’ n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). However, we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. Wilson v. State, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andrews v. State, 153 So. 3d 990, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 174, 2015 WL 73722 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
153 So. 3d 990 (Andrews v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Wilson v. State
775 So. 2d 1003 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)