Anderson v. State

113 S.E. 26, 28 Ga. App. 755, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 835
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 11, 1922·No. 13630·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

Upon conflicting evidence, the judgment of guilty was fully authorized. Eor no reason assigned, was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 113 S.E. 26, 28 Ga. App. 755, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 835 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

113 S.E. 26 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.