Anderson v. State
113 S.E. 26, 28 Ga. App. 755, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 835
This text of 113 S.E. 26 (Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Anderson v. State, 113 S.E. 26, 28 Ga. App. 755, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 835 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
Opinion
Upon conflicting evidence, the judgment of guilty was fully authorized. Eor no reason assigned, was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 26, 28 Ga. App. 755, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-gactapp-1922.