Anderson v. State
Opinion
The defendant in this case was charged with being upon a certain highway in an intoxicated condition, which intoxication was “ made manifest by boisterousness, by indecent condition and acting, and by vulgar, profane and unbecoming language, and loud and violent discourse of the defendant while so intoxicated.” The evidence did not authorize the defendant’s conviction, since there was no proof that upon the highway named he comported himself in the manner alleged. It was therefore error to overrule the motion for a new trial. See Davis v. State, 14 Ga. App. 569 (81 S. E. 906), and cases cited.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
108 S.E. 259 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.