Anderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Anderson v. State

106 S.E. 926, 26 Ga. App. 634, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 569

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 13, 1921

Docket12157

StatusPublished

This text of 106 S.E. 926 (Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. State, 106 S.E. 926, 26 Ga. App. 634, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 569 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case is here for review upon the ground that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. Upon conflicting evidence the jury convicted the defendant, Anderson, of having in his possession a pistol, not at his home or place of business, within the meaning of the statute (Park’s Ann. Penal Code, § 348(a)), without first having procured a license from the ordinary. There being evidence to support the verdict, and the verdict being approved by the trial judge, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

This case is here for review upon the ground that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. Upon conflicting evidence the jury convicted the defendant, Anderson, of having in his possession a pistol, not at his home or place of business, within the meaning of the statute (Park’s Ann. Penal Code, § 348(a)), without first having procured a license from the ordinary. There being evidence to support the verdict, and the verdict being approved by the trial judge, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 S.E. 926, 26 Ga. App. 634, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-gactapp-1921.