Anderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Anderson v. State

106 S.E. 926, 26 Ga. App. 634, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 569

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 13, 1921·No. 12157·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case is here for review upon the ground that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. Upon conflicting evidence the jury convicted the defendant, Anderson, of having in his possession a pistol, not at his home or place of business, within the meaning of the statute (Park’s Ann. Penal Code, § 348(a)), without first having procured a license from the ordinary. There being evidence to support the verdict, and the verdict being approved by the trial judge, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

This case is here for review upon the ground that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. Upon conflicting evidence the jury convicted the defendant, Anderson, of having in his possession a pistol, not at his home or place of business, within the meaning of the statute (Park’s Ann. Penal Code, § 348(a)), without first having procured a license from the ordinary. There being evidence to support the verdict, and the verdict being approved by the trial judge, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Anderson v. State, 106 S.E. 926, 26 Ga. App. 634, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 569 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

106 S.E. 926 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.