Anderson v. State

890 So. 2d 428, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19995, 2004 WL 2996783
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 2004·No. No. 1D03-3626·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand for correction of scrivener’s errors contained in the written [429]*429judgment.1 The judgment erroneously cites to section “322.26 or 28,” when the correct statutory citation for the offense of driving while license suspended or revoked as charged against the appellant is section 322.34(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2001). It also erroneously lists the first-degree misdemeanor offense as a third-degree felony. Accordingly, we affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence in all respects, but remand for correction of the scrivener’s errors. The appellant need not be present for the correction of the errors.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

ERVIN, DAVIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 890 So. 2d 428, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19995, 2004 WL 2996783 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

890 So. 2d 428 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RENE LOUIS ISMER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
253 So. 3d 769 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Price v. State
899 So. 2d 493 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)