Price v. State
900 So. 2d 759, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6470, 2005 WL 1026846
Opinion
Gregory R. Price appeals his conviction for burglary of an occupied dwelling, claiming that defense counsel’s objections during closing argument should have been sustained. We conclude that the closing argument is not materially distinguishable from that involved in De Jesus v. State, 684 So.2d 875, 875-76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), and affirm on authority of that case.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Price v. State, 900 So. 2d 759, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6470, 2005 WL 1026846 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
900 So. 2d 759 (Price v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Major v. State
900 So. 2d 759 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)