Anderson v. State

844 So. 2d 777, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7033, 2003 WL 21076576
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 780 So. 2d 1012
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 2003·No. No. 3D02-1383·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We deny the defendant’s motion for rehearing. We have thoroughly reviewed the record below, including the trial court’s comprehensive order considering the issues defendant raised in his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We find no reversible error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 844 So. 2d 777, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7033, 2003 WL 21076576 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

844 So. 2d 777 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.