Anderson v. State

623 So. 2d 639, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9470, 1993 WL 366868
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 592 So. 2d 1119
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 1993·No. No. 92-746·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Based upon our independent review of the record on appeal, we agree that, with the exception of a minor error regarding a condition of appellant’s probation following his release from incarceration, no good-faith argument can be made that reversible error occurred in the trial court. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, we strike that condition of appellant’s probation which requires him to pay one dollar per month to First Step, Inc., of Bay County, because the trial court did not orally pronounce that condition at sentencing. Coupe v. State, 591 So.2d 304 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED, as modified.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 623 So. 2d 639, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9470, 1993 WL 366868 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

623 So. 2d 639 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Coupe v. State
591 So. 2d 304 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)