Coupe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Coupe v. State

591 So. 2d 304, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12705, 1991 WL 272774

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 23, 1991

DocketNo. 89-770

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 591 So. 2d 304 (Coupe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coupe v. State, 591 So. 2d 304, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12705, 1991 WL 272774 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, David Coupe, appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence for two counts of fraudulent use of a credit card. While we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, we find it necessary to reverse a condition of probation imposed by the trial court, payment of $1.00 per month to First Step, Inc. of Bay County, as the written probation order imposing such condition varied from the trial judge's oral sentencing pronouncement which did not impose such a fee. The trial court is instructed to correct the written order to conform to the oral pronouncement. Sumter v. State, 570 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED in part, and REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

SHIVERS, ZEHMER and MINER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, David Coupe, appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence for two counts of fraudulent use of a credit card. While we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, we find it necessary to reverse a condition of probation imposed by the trial court, payment of $1.00 per month to First Step, Inc. of Bay County, as the written probation order imposing such condition varied from the trial judge's oral sentencing pronouncement which did not impose such a fee. The trial court is instructed to correct the written order to conform to the oral pronouncement. Sumter v. State, 570 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED in part, and REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

SHIVERS, ZEHMER and MINER, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

591 So. 2d 304, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12705, 1991 WL 272774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coupe-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack