American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. State

752 A.2d 1286, 164 N.J. 183, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 792
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 20, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 752 A.2d 1286 (American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. State, 752 A.2d 1286, 164 N.J. 183, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 792 (N.J. 2000).

Opinions

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the grant of interlocutory applications that originally arose from cross-motions for summary judgment in the Tax Court to determine whether the hazardous waste transporter fee imposed by N.J.A.C. 7:26-4A.3(g)(1)"creates an unconstitutional burden on interstate carriers of hazardous materials, 154 N.J. 604, 713 A.2d 497 (1998); 324 N.J.Super. 1, 734 A.2d 314 (App.Div.1999); 162 N.J. 124, 741 A.2d 93 (1999);

And the Court having determined that there are controverted issues of fact concerning the actual economic impact of the fee on interstate carriers of hazardous materials;

And the Court having further determined that when ultimate constitutional issues are especially fact-sensitive the Court should await, before decision, the presentation of a well-developed record, State Farm v. State, 124 N.J. 32, 63, 590 A.2d 191 (1991); Roadway Express, Inc. v. Kingsley, 37 N.J. 136, 140, 179 A.2d 729 (1962);

And the Court having further determined that such record will better enable the Court to determine the proper role of the United States Department of Transportation under the provisions of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Uniform Safety Act of 1990, now codified in 49 U.S.C.A. § 5101 to 5127;

And good cause appearing;

[184]*184It is OEDEEED that the matter is summarily remanded to the Tax Court for a plenary hearing on the allegedly discriminatory economic impact of the hazardous waste transporter fees; and it is further

OEDEEED that jurisdiction is otherwise retained; and it is further

OEDEEED that on the entry of the Tax Court’s opinion and order on remand, the parties shall have twenty-one days each as appellant and respondent, respectively, within which to file briefs and appendices in this Court; and it is further

OEDEEED that on the completion of briefing, the Court will determine whether further oral arguments are required.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Committee to Recall Menendez v. Wells
7 A.3d 720 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
State v. Henderson
39 A.3d 147 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2009)
Jones v. DEPT. OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
930 A.2d 477 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2007)
American Trucking Ass'n v. State
852 A.2d 142 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2004)
State v. Moore
852 A.2d 1073 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2004)
American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. State
752 A.2d 1286 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
752 A.2d 1286, 164 N.J. 183, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-trucking-associations-inc-v-state-nj-2000.