American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. The United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant

136 F.3d 793, 40 Fed. Cl. 793, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5325, 1998 WL 100119
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMarch 9, 1998
Docket95-5153, 95-5154
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 136 F.3d 793 (American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. The United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. The United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant, 136 F.3d 793, 40 Fed. Cl. 793, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5325, 1998 WL 100119 (Fed. Cir. 1998).

Opinion

ORDER

A combined petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in bane having been filed by the appellant, and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the cross appellant, and amicus having been granted leave to file a brief in support of the appellant’s combined petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc, and the petition for rehearing having been referred to and acted upon by the panel that heard the appeal, and, thereafter, the suggestion for rehearing in banc having been referred to the judges in regular active service to determine whether the appeal should be reheard in banc, and a poll having been requested, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is denied, and it is further

ORDERED that the suggestion to rehear the appeal in banc is accepted; the judgment of the court entered on September 24, 1997, and reported at 124 F.3d 1471, is vacated; and the opinion of the court accompanying the judgment is withdrawn;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that new briefs shall be filed. Appellant’s principal brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order. The court sua sponte allows the amicus to file a brief at the time. The dates for filing the remaining briefs shall be in accordance with Fed. Cir. R. 31(a). An original and 30 copies of all briefs shall be filed and two copies shall be served on opposing counsel.

Oral argument will be scheduled by later order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New Hampshire Flight Procurement, LLC v. United States
118 Fed. Cl. 203 (Federal Claims, 2014)
Threshold Technologies, Inc. v. United States
117 Fed. Cl. 681 (Federal Claims, 2014)
Enron Federal Solutions, Inc. v. United States
80 Fed. Cl. 382 (Federal Claims, 2008)
North Star Steel Co. v. United States
58 Fed. Cl. 720 (Federal Claims, 2003)
Hermes Consolidated, Inc. v. United States
58 Fed. Cl. 3 (Federal Claims, 2003)
Rosboro Lumber Co. v. United States
43 Fed. Cl. 606 (Federal Claims, 1999)
Frank & Breslow, LLP v. United States
43 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,439 (Federal Claims, 1999)
Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United States
42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,381 (Federal Claims, 1998)
PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United States
42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,325 (Federal Claims, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 F.3d 793, 40 Fed. Cl. 793, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5325, 1998 WL 100119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-telephone-and-telegraph-company-v-the-united-states-cafc-1998.