American Incentive Advisors LLC v. Western Landscape and Pavers LLC

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington
DecidedApril 18, 2024
Docket2:23-cv-00956
StatusUnknown

This text of American Incentive Advisors LLC v. Western Landscape and Pavers LLC (American Incentive Advisors LLC v. Western Landscape and Pavers LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Incentive Advisors LLC v. Western Landscape and Pavers LLC, (W.D. Wash. 2024).

Opinion

1 2 3

4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 AMERICAN INCENTIVE ADVISORS LLC, CASE NO. C23-956-KKE 8 Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO AMEND CORPORATE 9 DISCLOSURE WESTERN LANDSCAPE AND PAVERS 10 LLC et al., Defendant(s). 11

12 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s deficient corporate disclosure statement. 13 Dkt. No. 19. 14 On July 5, 2023, Plaintiff filed its first corporate disclosure statement under Federal Rule 15 of Civil Procedure 7.1, stating “AIA’s parent company is Triple Crown Holdings LLC. There is 16 no publicly held corporation that holds ten percent (10%) or more of AIA stock. AIA is organized 17 and existing under the laws of the State of Texas, with its principal place of business in the State 18 of Texas.” Dkt. No. 2. On March 14, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to “file an amended 19 corporate disclosure statement that includes the identities and citizenship of its members as 20 required by W.D. Wash. LCR 7.1(b).” Dkt. No. 18. On March 27, 2024, Plaintiff filed an amended 21 corporate disclosure statement adding the citizenship of its majority shareholder (another LLC), 22 23 24 1 the citizenship of its owner, and the citizenship of its managers.1 Dkt. No. 19. This amended 2 disclosure is still deficient because it fails to fully identify all of the members of Triple Crown 3 Holdings LLC and their citizenship. This deficiency prevents the Court from determining whether 4 there is subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, which is required to adjudicate 5 Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 13). 6 Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to correct this deficiency and provide a new corporate 7 disclosure statement identifying each of its members and their citizenship by April 25, 2024. To 8 the extent any members of Plaintiff are also LLCs, Plaintiff must provide the citizenship of those 9 members as well. LCR 7.1(b) (requiring disclosure of any member’s members); see, e.g., Nippon 10 Paper Indus. USA Co. v. Georgia Pac., LLC, No. 3:22-CV-05743-LK, 2023 WL 422940, at *1 11 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 26, 2023). 12 Dated this 18th day of April, 2024.

13 A 14 Kymberly K. Evanson 15 United States District Judge

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

1 It is not clear whether Plaintiff is using the terms “shareholder” or “manager” to mean LLC member. 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
American Incentive Advisors LLC v. Western Landscape and Pavers LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-incentive-advisors-llc-v-western-landscape-and-pavers-llc-wawd-2024.