American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

11 F. Supp. 26, 1935 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1527
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 4, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MACK, Circuit Judge.

This application prays for a permanent injunction against the city of New York, acting by the Transit Commission, restraining the further prosecution of an action heretofore commenced in the New York Supreme Court against the Inter-borough Company and its receiver for a declaratory judgment to determine the obligations of the company undei' contract 3 and related certificates.- The briefs submitted on behalf of the Transit Commission are for the most part a rearguxnent of the questions decided by this court on January 18, 1935, when it denied the applications of the city, acting separately by the Transit Commission and by its corporation counsel, for leave to bring just such a suit as this in the state courts. 10 F. Supp. 512. The order entered on [27]*27the application of the city, acting by its corporation counsel, was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals on April 1, 1935, 76 F.(2d) 1002, and certiorari was denied June 3, 1935, City of New York v. Murray, 55 S. Ct. 923, 79 L. Ed. -; no appeal was taken from the order on the city’s application, acting by the Transit Commission. The court having, in the exercise of its discretionary powers, denied leave to bring the suit, necessarily determined that there was no absolute right so to sue; otherwise, the denial would have been an abuse of discretion. On careful reconsideration, I am still of the opinion then expressed. It follows, therefore, that the prosecution of such a suit, when brought during the pendency of this receivership proceeding without leave of this court, must be enjoined.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 11 F. Supp. 26, 1935 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1527 (S.D.N.Y. 1935).

11 F. Supp. 26 (American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murray v. Transit Commission
11 F. Supp. 27 (S.D. New York, 1935)