Amedeo v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.

183 N.W. 929, 215 Mich. 37, 1921 Mich. LEXIS 724
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 19, 1921·No. Docket No. 104·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinions

Stone, J.

Plaintiff brought this action as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Leo Amedeo, to recover damages for the latter’s death by three of defendant’s detached cars, while being shunted or switched, striking and instantly killing deceased in the yard of the defendant, at the Third street crossing in the city of Kalamazoo in the early evening of April 6, 1920. The accompanying sketch offered in evidence as Exhibit 1, showing the location of de[40]*40fendant’s tracks, and intersecting streets between Grace street on the north, and Vine street on the south, in said city, will aid in understanding the situation. By reason of the failure of appellant’s counsel to comply with Rule No. 40, and to make “a clear and concise statement of the facts of the case,” our labors have been much increased. We glean from the record the following statement:

[39]*39

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amedeo v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co., 183 N.W. 929, 215 Mich. 37, 1921 Mich. LEXIS 724 (Mich. 1921).

183 N.W. 929 (Amedeo v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burke v. Angies, Inc
373 N.W.2d 187 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1985)
Kovacs v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
351 N.W.2d 581 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1984)
Mudd v. Quinn
462 S.W.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1971)
People v. Gregory
174 N.W.2d 905 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1969)
Birkhill v. Todd
174 N.W.2d 56 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1969)
Eastman v. Ann Arbor Railroad
145 N.W.2d 275 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1966)
Elliott v. Black River Electric Cooperative
104 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1958)
Bishop v. New York Central Railroad
83 N.W.2d 278 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1957)
Wallace v. Kramer
296 N.W. 838 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1941)
Perri v. Tassie
292 N.W. 370 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1940)
Motyka v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
235 N.W. 825 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1931)
Day v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.
233 N.W. 425 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1930)
Kiefer v. Fink
210 N.W. 205 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1926)
West v. Detroit Terminal Railroad
201 N.W. 955 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1925)
Hudson v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.
198 N.W. 339 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1924)
Mohrloch v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago Railroad
194 N.W. 592 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1923)