Ambos v. Chastain

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ambos v. Chastain

43 S.E.2d 592, 75 Ga. App. 393, 1947 Ga. App. LEXIS 548

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 11, 1947

Docket31621.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 43 S.E.2d 592 (Ambos v. Chastain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ambos v. Chastain, 43 S.E.2d 592, 75 Ga. App. 393, 1947 Ga. App. LEXIS 548 (Ga. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Pabkek, J.

Where three distinct persons having no privity of interest among them, except that each owned separately certain fishing boats which had been assessed for taxation by the town, filed an appeal to the Board of Tax Assessors of the Town of Thunderbolt, seeking to have the tax assessments reduced, and where said appeal was denied and the three parties joined in a petition for certiorari to the superior court, and the superior court dismissed the petition, and where the parties filed a single bill of exceptions to this court complaining of the order dismissing the petition, and where no order of consolidation was taken by the board or otherwise, this court, under the rule stated in Patterson v. Hendrix, 72 Ga. 204, has no jurisdiction; and on motion duly made the case must be dismissed. See also Pupke, Reid & Phelps v. Meador, 72 Ga. 230(1); Western Assurance Co. v. Way, 98 Ga. 746 (27 S. E. 167); *394 Erwin v. Ennis, 1.04 Ga. 861 (31 S. E. 444) ; Hicks v. Walker, 105 Ga. 480 (30 S. E. 383) ; Haralson County v. Pittman, 105 Ga. 513 (31 S. E. 183) Wells v. Coker Banking Co., 113 Ga. 857 (39 S. E. 298) ; Purvis v. Ferst’s Sons & Co., 114 Ga. 689 (40 S. E. 723) ; Askew v. Powell, 30 Ga. App. 244 (117 S. E. 769).

Decided July 11, 1947. Robert. E. Falligant, for plaintiffs. Walter W. Hinely, for defendants.

Writ of error dismissed.

Sutton, C. J., and Felton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pabkek, J.

Where three distinct persons having no privity of interest among them, except that each owned separately certain fishing boats which had been assessed for taxation by the town, filed an appeal to the Board of Tax Assessors of the Town of Thunderbolt, seeking to have the tax assessments reduced, and where said appeal was denied and the three parties joined in a petition for certiorari to the superior court, and the superior court dismissed the petition, and where the parties filed a single bill of exceptions to this court complaining of the order dismissing the petition, and where no order of consolidation was taken by the board or otherwise, this court, under the rule stated in Patterson v. Hendrix, 72 Ga. 204, has no jurisdiction; and on motion duly made the case must be dismissed. See also Pupke, Reid & Phelps v. Meador, 72 Ga. 230(1); Western Assurance Co. v. Way, 98 Ga. 746 (27 S. E. 167); *394 Erwin v. Ennis, 1.04 Ga. 861 (31 S. E. 444) ; Hicks v. Walker, 105 Ga. 480 (30 S. E. 383) ; Haralson County v. Pittman, 105 Ga. 513 (31 S. E. 183) Wells v. Coker Banking Co., 113 Ga. 857 (39 S. E. 298) ; Purvis v. Ferst’s Sons & Co., 114 Ga. 689 (40 S. E. 723) ; Askew v. Powell, 30 Ga. App. 244 (117 S. E. 769).

Decided July 11, 1947. Robert. E. Falligant, for plaintiffs. Walter W. Hinely, for defendants.

Writ of error dismissed.

Sutton, C. J., and Felton, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 S.E.2d 592, 75 Ga. App. 393, 1947 Ga. App. LEXIS 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambos-v-chastain-gactapp-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack