Haralson County v. Pittman

31 S.E. 183, 105 Ga. 513, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 657
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 26, 1898·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

XiEwis, J.

Where two cases against the same defendant, and in favor of different plaintiffs who have no privity of interest of any sort between them, are by consent of the parties tried together before an inferior judicatory, the judge of the superior court can not entertain .jurisdiction over the cases by one petition for certiorari complaining of the verdict in favor of each plaintiff; and this court has no .jurisdiction in such a case brought here by one writ of error complaining of the judgment of the court below in overruling the petition for certiorari. Patterson v. Hendrix, 72 Ga. 204; Hicks v. Walker, ante, 480; Western Assurance Co. v. Way, 98 Ga. 746.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haralson County v. Pittman, 31 S.E. 183, 105 Ga. 513, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 657 (Ga. 1898).

31 S.E. 183 (Haralson County v. Pittman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ambos v. Chastain
43 S.E.2d 592 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Lowery v. Wilcox
174 S.E. 149 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Shouse v. Gober
167 S.E. 316 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Wall v. Mann
135 S.E. 407 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Harper v. Stumpff
1921 OK 430 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1921)
Jones v. Maril
91 S.E. 445 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Heitmann v. Commercial Bank
65 S.E. 590 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Walker v. Conn & Co.
37 S.E. 403 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)