Hicks v. Walker
This text of 30 S.E. 383 (Hicks v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where two-actions in favor of the same plaintiff, but against different defendants, were consolidated in the court below and referred to an auditor, who' reported thereon, making separate findings against each defendant; and where the defendants joined in filing exceptions to the auditor’s report, this court has no jurisdiction to entertain a bill of exceptions, in which both the defendants unite, complaining of error in the judgment of the court disallowing their exceptions to the auditor’s report. Western Assurance Co. v. Way, 98 Ga. 746.
Writ of' error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 S.E. 383, 105 Ga. 480, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-walker-ga-1898.