Alvarez v. Texas Education Agency

W.D. Texas

Alvarez v. Texas Education Agency

DecidedFebruary 7, 2020

Docket1:19-cv-00921

StatusUnknown

This text of Alvarez v. Texas Education Agency (Alvarez v. Texas Education Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alvarez v. Texas Education Agency, (W.D. Tex. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

ALFREDO ALVAREZ, parent of J.A., a minor § child, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § 1:19-CV-921-RP § TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, § § Defendant. §

ORDER Before the Court is Alfredo Alvarez’s Motion to Appoint Guardian/Attorney ad Litem. (Dkt. 3). In his motion, Mr. Alvarez seeks to be appointed as his son J.A.’s next friend for this lawsuit against Defendant Texas Education Agency (“TEA”). (Id.). Mr. Alvarez states that J.A. is now an adult. (Id.). Mr. Alvarez explains that he had sole custody over his son, J.A., per his divorce agreement and holds a signed Education Power of Attorney signed by J.A. (Id. at 1). TEA did not file an opposition to this motion. Later, in its First Amended Motion to Dismiss, TEA contends that Mr. Alvarez lacks standing to pursue his claims on his son’s behalf because his son is no longer a minor. (Dkt. 18, at 4–5). While the Court will address TEA’s standing argument in its order on TEA’s First Amended Motion to Dismiss, the Court notes that TEA concedes that it did not object to Mr. Alvarez’s Motion to Appoint Next Friend. (Id. at 5). In J.A. v. Corpus Christi ISD, the Southern District of Texas appointed Mr. Alvarez as J.A.’s next friend in their lawsuit against Corpus Christ Independent School District. 384 F. Supp. 3d 773, 774–75 (S.D. Tex. 2019). The court in that case noted that “J.A. suffers from Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, a congenital syndrome characterized by cognitive defects. According to Plaintiffs, J.A. functions at the level of a first or second grade child. CCISD does not dispute this evidence and there is no indication that a conflict of interest exists between J.A. and Alvarez.” Id. at 774. Additionally, in the Amended Complaint in this case, Mr. Alvarez alleges that J.A. “has significant cognitive impairments” and he was permitted to participate and make decisions on J.A.’s behalf at J.A.’s school before and after J.A. turned eighteen. (Dkt. 17, at 8). For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that Alfredo Alvarez is APPOINTED as J.A.’s next friend.

SIGNED on February 7, 2020.

ROBERT PITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

ALFREDO ALVAREZ, parent of J.A., a minor § child, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § 1:19-CV-921-RP § TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, § § Defendant. §

ORDER Before the Court is Alfredo Alvarez’s Motion to Appoint Guardian/Attorney ad Litem. (Dkt. 3). In his motion, Mr. Alvarez seeks to be appointed as his son J.A.’s next friend for this lawsuit against Defendant Texas Education Agency (“TEA”). (Id.). Mr. Alvarez states that J.A. is now an adult. (Id.). Mr. Alvarez explains that he had sole custody over his son, J.A., per his divorce agreement and holds a signed Education Power of Attorney signed by J.A. (Id. at 1). TEA did not file an opposition to this motion. Later, in its First Amended Motion to Dismiss, TEA contends that Mr. Alvarez lacks standing to pursue his claims on his son’s behalf because his son is no longer a minor. (Dkt. 18, at 4–5). While the Court will address TEA’s standing argument in its order on TEA’s First Amended Motion to Dismiss, the Court notes that TEA concedes that it did not object to Mr. Alvarez’s Motion to Appoint Next Friend. (Id. at 5). In J.A. v. Corpus Christi ISD, the Southern District of Texas appointed Mr. Alvarez as J.A.’s next friend in their lawsuit against Corpus Christ Independent School District. 384 F. Supp. 3d 773, 774–75 (S.D. Tex. 2019). The court in that case noted that “J.A. suffers from Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, a congenital syndrome characterized by cognitive defects. According to Plaintiffs, J.A. functions at the level of a first or second grade child. CCISD does not dispute this evidence and there is no indication that a conflict of interest exists between J.A. and Alvarez.” Id. at 774. Additionally, in the Amended Complaint in this case, Mr. Alvarez alleges that J.A. “has significant cognitive impairments” and he was permitted to participate and make decisions on J.A.’s behalf at J.A.’s school before and after J.A. turned eighteen. (Dkt. 17, at 8). For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that Alfredo Alvarez is APPOINTED as J.A.’s next friend.

SIGNED on February 7, 2020.

ROBERT PITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Alvarez v. Texas Education Agency, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarez-v-texas-education-agency-txwd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack