Alvarez v. State

111 So. 3d 969, 2013 WL 1775550, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6721
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 26, 2013
DocketNo. 5D11-3985
StatusPublished

This text of 111 So. 3d 969 (Alvarez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alvarez v. State, 111 So. 3d 969, 2013 WL 1775550, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6721 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lemuel Alvarez timely appeals his conviction by jury verdict for one count of aggravated battery with a firearm,1 also challenging the trial judge’s denial of his 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct sentencing [970]*970errors, which addressed several cost issues. As the State concedes, the $20 assessment imposed pursuant to the “Crime Stoppers Trust Fund”2 and an inapplicable $3 traffic violation cost were improperly imposed at sentencing. Additionally, the State acknowledges that the written court costs/fee order contains a $1 mathematical error that needs to be corrected. On remand, these items shall be corrected by entry of an amended order. No other issue merits discussion.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS TO ENTER AMENDED COURT COST/FEE ORDER.

LAWSON, JACOBUS and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanders v. State
101 So. 3d 373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 So. 3d 969, 2013 WL 1775550, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarez-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.