Alvarez v. State

95 So. 3d 1054, 2012 WL 3964822, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15321

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alvarez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19920 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 2012·No. No. 4D11-1468·Published

Opinion

[1055]*1055 On Request To Certify Question to the Florida Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

We certify the following question, also certified in Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), as a question of great public importance:

SHOULD THE RULING IN PADILLA V. KENTUCKY, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVTCTION PROCEEDINGS?

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1055]*1055 On Request To Certify Question to the Florida Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

We certify the following question, also certified in Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), as a question of great public importance:

SHOULD THE RULING IN PADILLA V. KENTUCKY, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVTCTION PROCEEDINGS?

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Alvarez v. State, 95 So. 3d 1054, 2012 WL 3964822, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15321 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

95 So. 3d 1054 (Alvarez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Padilla v. Kentucky

559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Barrios-Cruz v. State

63 So. 3d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Opinion

Related