Alvarado v. Stanton

267 P. 313, 204 Cal. 172
California Supreme Court·Decided May 14, 1928·No. Docket No. L.A. 9787.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[1] Respondents have made two motions to dismiss appeals. The appellants, as plaintiffs in the court below, instituted two actions against respondents, as defendants, one in ejectment (No. 182,980), the other to quiet title (No. 191,794). Judgment in each case was entered for the defendants. Motions for new trial were denied, but on motion of the plaintiffs the trial court vacated and set aside the judgments and entered new judgments in their stead. Plaintiffs appealed from each of the new judgments, but subsequently the orders vacating the original judgments, and the substituted judgments entered thereon, were annulled by this court on certiorari. (Stanton v. Superior Court, 202 Cal. 478 [261 P. 1001].) The remittitur was filed in the court below January 28, 1928.

Any question raised by the appeals having become moot, the appeals are, and each is, dismissed.

Richards, J., Shenk, J., Langdon, J., Preston, J., and Curtis, J., concurred. *Page 173

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvarado v. Stanton, 267 P. 313, 204 Cal. 172 (Cal. 1928).

267 P. 313 (Alvarado v. Stanton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Panich v. Portnoy CA2/2
California Court of Appeal, 2016
Mountain States Implement Co. v. Arave
2 P.2d 314 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1931)
Alvarado v. Stanton
267 P. 313 (California Supreme Court, 1928)