Alvarado v. Stanton

California Supreme Court

Alvarado v. Stanton

204 Cal. 172

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMay 14, 1928

DocketL. A. No. 9787

StatusPublished

This text of 204 Cal. 172 (Alvarado v. Stanton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alvarado v. Stanton, 204 Cal. 172 (Cal. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

WASTE, C. J.

Respondents have made two motions to dismiss appeals. The appellants, as plaintiffs in the court below, instituted two actions against respondents, as defendants, one in ejectment (No. 182,980), the other to quiet title (No. 191,794). Judgment in each case was entered for the defendants. Motions for new trial were denied, but on motion of the plaintiffs the trial court vacated and set aside the judgments and entered new judgments in their stead. Plaintiffs appealed from each of the new judgments, but subsequently the orders vacating the original judgments, and the substituted judgments entered thereon, "were annulled by this court on certiorari. (Stanton v. Superior Court, 202 Cal. 478 [261 Pac. 1001].) The remittitur was filed in the court below January 28, 1928.

Any question raised by the appeals having become moot, the appeals are, and each is, dismissed.

Richards, J., Shenk, J., Langdon, J., Preston, J., and Curtis, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WASTE, C. J.

Respondents have made two motions to dismiss appeals. The appellants, as plaintiffs in the court below, instituted two actions against respondents, as defendants, one in ejectment (No. 182,980), the other to quiet title (No. 191,794). Judgment in each case was entered for the defendants. Motions for new trial were denied, but on motion of the plaintiffs the trial court vacated and set aside the judgments and entered new judgments in their stead. Plaintiffs appealed from each of the new judgments, but subsequently the orders vacating the original judgments, and the substituted judgments entered thereon, "were annulled by this court on certiorari. (Stanton v. Superior Court, 202 Cal. 478 [261 Pac. 1001].) The remittitur was filed in the court below January 28, 1928.

Any question raised by the appeals having become moot, the appeals are, and each is, dismissed.

Richards, J., Shenk, J., Langdon, J., Preston, J., and Curtis, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 Cal. 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarado-v-stanton-cal-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack