Allied Fibers & Plastics v. Cibula

428 S.E.2d 905, 245 Va. 337, 9 Va. Law Rep. 1166, 1993 Va. LEXIS 58
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedApril 16, 1993
DocketRecord No. 920747
StatusPublished
Cited by43 cases

This text of 428 S.E.2d 905 (Allied Fibers & Plastics v. Cibula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allied Fibers & Plastics v. Cibula, 428 S.E.2d 905, 245 Va. 337, 9 Va. Law Rep. 1166, 1993 Va. LEXIS 58 (Va. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case, the Industrial Commission of Virginia (now the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission) held that the employer, Allied Fibers & Plastics (Allied), was not equitably estopped from asserting the two-year statute of limitations prescribed by Code *338 § 65.1-87 (now Code § 65.2-601) and that the claim of the employee, Ernest J. Cibula, was time-barred. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that “[t]he evidence in this record leads unerringly to the conclusion that Allied is estopped from invoking the statute of limitations.” Cibula v. Allied Fibers & Plastics, 14 Va. App. 319, 326, 416 S.E.2d 708, 712 (1992).

In its petition for appeal to this Court, Allied contended that the Court of Appeals erred (1) in holding that the Commission applied an “improper standard” to the question whether Allied was equitably estopped from invoking the statute of limitations, (2) in finding that the case did not present a matter of conflicting evidence or a dispute concerning the Commission’s findings of fact, and (3) in refusing to hold that Cibula had failed to preserve the estoppel question for appeal purposes. Determining that the holding of the Court of Appeals regarding an “improper standard” presented a matter of significant precedential value, Code § 17-116.07(B), and that all three of the claims of error should be reviewed, we awarded Allied an appeal.

Upon consideration of Allied’s contentions, we find there is no error in the judgment under review. Accordingly, we will adopt the Court of Appeals’ opinion as our own and affirm its judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jerry Lee Gibbs v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2017
Alfred Lamar Diggs v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2015
Williamson v. Virginia Employment Commission
690 S.E.2d 304 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2010)
Sears Roebuck & Company v. William Larry Cruse
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2010
NiSource, Inc. v. Thomas
674 S.E.2d 581 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2009)
Miller v. Potomac Hospital Foundation
653 S.E.2d 592 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2007)
James Melvin Ashby v. Ramar Coal Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2007
Corporate Resource Management, Inc. v. Southers
646 S.E.2d 10 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2007)
Darrell W Weikle v. The Southland Corporation, et a
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2003
Strong v. Old Dominion Power Co.
543 S.E.2d 598 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2001)
Royster Clark, Inc. and Legion Ins. Co. v. Bays
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1999
USAir, Inc. v. Robert S. Joyce
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1999
Jerry Gilbert Dodson v. Newport News Shipbuiling,et
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1999
Roscoe Chitwood v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours
513 S.E.2d 890 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1999)
Wade Michael Sheldon v. Spirits Restaurant
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1999
USAir, Inc. v. Joyce
497 S.E.2d 904 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1998)
Uninsured Employer's Fund v. Rose L. Harper
495 S.E.2d 540 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
428 S.E.2d 905, 245 Va. 337, 9 Va. Law Rep. 1166, 1993 Va. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allied-fibers-plastics-v-cibula-va-1993.