Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Alley v. Halcombe

Alley v. Halcombe

22 S.E. 901, 96 Ga. 810
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 29, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 22 S.E. 901 (Alley v. Halcombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alley v. Halcombe, 22 S.E. 901, 96 Ga. 810 (Ga. 1895).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

The judgment denying a rule absolute upon the mortgage foreclosure was, in effect, a judgment of nonsuit; and it was too late, after the expiration of the term at which it was rendered, to move to reinstate the plaintiff’s case because of error committed in the rendition of that judgment. The plaintiff should either have moved to reinstate during the term, or have filed a bill of exceptions within the time prescribed by law.

Judgment affirmed.

EL H. Dean, W. T. Crane and J. W. H. Underwood, for plaintiff. J. B. Estes and Perry & Craiu, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gray v. State
850 S.E.2d 36 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2020)
Askren v. Allen
208 S.E.2d 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Jacobs v. State
97 S.E.2d 528 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
South v. State
33 S.E.2d 23 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Durden v. Durden
12 S.E.2d 305 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Haddon v. Brinson
148 S.E. 541 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Miraglia v. Bryson
111 S.E. 655 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Sparks v. National Union Fire Insurance
97 S.E. 462 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.E. 901, 96 Ga. 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alley-v-halcombe-ga-1895.