Jacobs v. State

97 S.E.2d 528, 95 Ga. App. 155, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 742
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 18, 1957
Docket36521
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 97 S.E.2d 528 (Jacobs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobs v. State, 97 S.E.2d 528, 95 Ga. App. 155, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 742 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957).

Opinions

Gardner, P. J.

Code § 27-601, after providing the statute of limitations in which indictments may be returned, further provides in Subsection 4: “If the indictment is found within the time limited, and for any informality shall be quashed or a nolle prosequi entered, a new indictment may be found and prosecuted within six months from time the first is quashed or the nolle prosequi entered.” From the facts above stated it would thus be seen that 15 months and 28 days after the nolle prosequi order was entered the court sought to vacate the order of nolle prosequi and to reinstate the indictment. This was clearly in contravention of the provision of Code § 27-601 Subsection 4 quoted above. The Code section states distinctly and clearly that where a nolle prosequi order is entered another indictment may be obtained provided it is done within six months. Moreover, we might add here that the six-months period allowed for the return of a new indictment must be within the statute of limitation of the crime [157]*157involved. Thus it will be seen that the court had no authority to reinstate the indictment or return after the expiration of six months from the date of the nolle prosequi order (and this must be within the statute of limitation of the crime involved).

The court erred in setting aside the nolle prosequi order.

Judgment reversed.

Carlisle, J., concurs. Townsend, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGahee v. State
213 S.E.2d 91 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Askren v. Allen
208 S.E.2d 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Hodges v. State
104 S.E.2d 704 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E.2d 528, 95 Ga. App. 155, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-state-gactapp-1957.