Haddon v. Brinson
This text of 148 S.E. 541 (Haddon v. Brinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where an action was dismissed by a judgment sustaining a general demurrer, and during the same term of court the plaintiff orally moved to set the judgment of dismissal aside as having been erroneously granted, but procured no ruling thereon, and filed no writ[799]*799ten motion with an order of the court directing the defendant to show cause, etc., a renewal of the oral motion at a subsequent term of the court came too late, and was therefore properly overruled. See E. T., V. & G. Ry. Co. v. Greene, 95 Ga. 35 (22 S. E. 36) ; Alley v. Holcombe, 96 Ga. 810 (22 S. E. 901) ; So. Ry. Co. v. Empire Printing Co., 120 Ga. 43 (47 S. E. 542); Shore v. Brown, 19 Ga. App. 476 (6) (91 S. E. 909).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 S.E. 541, 39 Ga. App. 798, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haddon-v-brinson-gactapp-1929.