Allen v. State

402 S.W.3d 611, 2013 WL 3328872, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 805
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Allen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 821
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 2013·No. No. ED 98737·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Allen appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. State, 402 S.W.3d 611, 2013 WL 3328872, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 805 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

402 S.W.3d 611 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.