Allen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Allen v. State

323 S.W.3d 84, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1413, 2010 WL 4075439

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Allen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 821 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 2010·No. No. ED 93399·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Roger Allen, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Roger Allen, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Allen v. State, 323 S.W.3d 84, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1413, 2010 WL 4075439 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

323 S.W.3d 84 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.