Allen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Allen v. State

482 S.W.3d 824, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 184, 2016 WL 796704

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 1, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102603

StatusPublished

This text of 482 S.W.3d 824 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. State, 482 S.W.3d 824, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 184, 2016 WL 796704 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nathan Allen appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

[825]*825No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nathan Allen appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

[825]*825No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

482 S.W.3d 824, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 184, 2016 WL 796704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-state-moctapp-2016.