Allen v. State
This text of 51 S.E. 506 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A demurrer to an indictment, on the ground that “said indictment shows upon its face interlineations, alterations, substitutions, and changes from the form in which it was originally drawn,” is not good, there being nothing to indicate that the alterations were made subsequently to the time the indictment was acted upon by the grand jury. Jones v. State, 09 Ga. 46; Cook v. State, 119 Ga. 110.
2. An indictment for a violation of the Penal Code, § 511, prohibiting throwing rocks or shooting at or in railroad or street cars, need not allege that [500]*500the car at which it is charged that the accused threw or shot belonged to a chartered railroad company.
3. The indictments in the cases of Sanders v. State, 118 Ga. 788, and Kiser v. State, 89 Ga. 421, were based on Penal Code, §520, and are therefore distinguishable from the case at bar.
4. The evidence was largely circumstantial, but that introduced by the State was sufficient to warrant the conviction of the accused; and it was not error to overrule the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 S.E. 506, 123 Ga. 499, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-state-ga-1905.