Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Goodman

62 S.E. 97, 4 Ga. App. 631, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 494
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 31, 1908·No. 1157·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

It is essential to tlie maintenance of a certiorari from a justice’s court that the answer should show ‘that there has been a final judgment or verdict rendered; but this fact may properly appear either in the answer, in the form of a direct statement, or in any other way which will sufficiently verify it. Where, as a part of the answer, [632]*632the justice sends up a certified copy of the proceedings in the court below, and a final verdict or judgment appears therein, this is a .sufficient verification of the existence of such judgment or verdict. Landrum v. Moss, 1 Ga. App. 216 (57 S. E. 965); Brown v. Atlanta, 123 Ga. 499 (51 S. E. 507). Judgment reversed.

Certiorari, from Berrien superior court — Judge Mitchell. March 25, 1908. Submitted July 2, Decided July 31, 1908. Buie & Knight, for plaintiff in error. J. W. Powell, Watts Powell, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Goodman, 62 S.E. 97, 4 Ga. App. 631, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 494 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

62 S.E. 97 (Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Goodman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beavers v. Cassells
192 S.E. 249 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Freedman v. Bush
119 S.E. 421 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Phillips v. Jones
66 S.E. 401 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Fudge v. Kelly
64 S.E. 316 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)