Allen v. State

554 So. 2d 36, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 30, 1990 WL 127
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Allen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 515 So. 2d 256
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 4, 1990·No. No. 88-2531·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric Allen appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine.

We have considered Allen’s appellate presentation and the record. We are unable to say that the trial court abused its discretion or committed reversible error.

The underlying theme is that Allen was not furnished with effective representation by counsel. Because of this we affirm without prejudice to Allen’s right to seek post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

AFFIRMED.

WALDEN, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. State, 554 So. 2d 36, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 30, 1990 WL 127 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

554 So. 2d 36 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.