Allen v. State

502 So. 2d 950, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 334, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6412
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 21, 1987·No. No. 85-2710·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his sentences in which the trial court departed upward from the sentencing guidelines range. We find that the record in this case “amply illustrates sufficient facts rendering the crime a highly extraordinary and extreme incident” of manslaughter. Vanover v. State, 498 So.2d 899 (Fla.1986). See also Lerma v. State, 497 So.2d 736 (Fla.1986) (excessive brutality may support a departure sentence against a defendant convicted of sexual battery by slight force if facts supporting such finding are proven beyond reasonable doubt). We further find that the extent of departure in this case was not an abuse of discretion. See Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985).

Appellant’s final contention is that the trial court erred in imposing costs without affording him notice and a hearing. Appellant, however, waived such notice and hearing in his signed affidavit of insolvency. Therefore, this point is without merit. See Dailey v. State, 501 So.2d 15 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Accordingly, appellant’s sentences are affirmed.

DANAHY, C.J., and SCHOONOVER and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. State, 502 So. 2d 950, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 334, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6412 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

502 So. 2d 950 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gopaul v. State
536 So. 2d 296 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Smith v. Wainwright
508 So. 2d 768 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Arnold v. State
505 So. 2d 1104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)