Allen v. State

482 So. 2d 529, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 299, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6116
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Allen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 463 So. 2d 351
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 30, 1986·No. No. BH-328·Published

Opinion

THOMPSON, Judge.

Appellant filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel in that his court appointed attorney failed to conduct an adequate pretrial investigation. He also alleges that counsel deliberately sabotaged his defense by conceding his [530]*530guilt at trial. The court summarily denied the motion, stating that it failed “to allege a factual basis upon which relief can be granted.” However, no portion of the transcript or record has been attached to the lower court’s order in support of its denial of appellant’s motion. Summary denial of a facially sufficient motion for post conviction relief is improper unless the court attaches to its order the portions of the record refuting the allegations.

The lower court’s order is reversed, and the case is remanded so that the court may either attach portions of the record conclusively showing appellant is entitled to no relief or hold an evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ZEHMER, J., concurs. BARFIELD, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. State, 482 So. 2d 529, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 299, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6116 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

482 So. 2d 529 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.