Allen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Allen v. State

554 So. 2d 36, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 30, 1990 WL 127

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 4, 1990

DocketNo. 88-2531

StatusPublished

This text of 554 So. 2d 36 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. State, 554 So. 2d 36, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 30, 1990 WL 127 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric Allen appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine.

We have considered Allen’s appellate presentation and the record. We are unable to say that the trial court abused its discretion or committed reversible error.

The underlying theme is that Allen was not furnished with effective representation by counsel. Because of this we affirm without prejudice to Allen’s right to seek post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

AFFIRMED.

WALDEN, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI