Allen v. Allen

225 A.D. 873
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. While defendant was not entitled to notice of the application to take the testimony by deposition pursuant to the provisions of section 295 of the Civil Practice Act, since the action had not then been commenced, the testimony so taken cannot be read in evidence upon the trial of the action for the reason that it was taken orally under the order without notice to the defendant. (Civ. Prae. Act, § 303.) A contrary ruling would deprive the defendant of her right to cross-examine the witness. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. Allen, 225 A.D. 873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

225 A.D. 873 (Allen v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivera v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.
2025 NY Slip Op 30843(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
State v. Metz
171 Misc. 2d 525 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)
Hoffman v. Batridge
155 Misc. 2d 862 (New York Supreme Court, 1992)
In re Ferkauf
3 F.R.D. 89 (S.D. New York, 1943)