Alexander v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
This text of 610 S.E.2d 374 (Alexander v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John ALEXANDER, Employee
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., Employer,
American Home Assurance Company, Carrier.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Brumbaugh, Mu & King, P.A., Jacksonville, by Nicole D. Wray and Charles R. Hassell Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.
Young Moore and Henderson P.A., Raleigh, by Zachary C. Bolen and Dawn Dillon Raynor, for defendant-appellees.
Kathleen Shannon Glancy, Wilmington, Counsel for the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
610 S.E.2d 374, 359 N.C. 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-wal-mart-stores-inc-nc-2005.