Alexander v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
610 S.E.2d 374, 359 N.C. 403
Opinion
John ALEXANDER, Employee
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., Employer,
American Home Assurance Company, Carrier.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Brumbaugh, Mu & King, P.A., Jacksonville, by Nicole D. Wray and Charles R. Hassell Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.
Young Moore and Henderson P.A., Raleigh, by Zachary C. Bolen and Dawn Dillon Raynor, for defendant-appellees.
Kathleen Shannon Glancy, Wilmington, Counsel for the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alexander v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 610 S.E.2d 374, 359 N.C. 403 (N.C. 2005).
610 S.E.2d 374 (Alexander v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Erickson v. Siegler
672 S.E.2d 772 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
Terasaka v. AT & T
622 S.E.2d 145 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Mayfield v. Hannifin
621 S.E.2d 243 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)