Albers v. Koffman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Albers v. Koffman

815 S.W.2d 486, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1446, 1991 WL 179410

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 17, 1991

DocketNo. WD 44682

StatusPublished

This text of 815 S.W.2d 486 (Albers v. Koffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Albers v. Koffman, 815 S.W.2d 486, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1446, 1991 WL 179410 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinions

FENNER, Judge.

Relator, Scott Albers, is the Public Defender for the 18th Judicial Circuit. In this action, Albers seeks to prohibit respondent, The Honorable Robert L. Koffman, from carrying out the court’s order that Albers, in his capacity as Public Defender, represent a Frank Williams in a civil contempt proceeding arising from alleged non-payment of child support. [487]*487This case presents an identical issue based upon the same facts as were presented in In Re Scott Albers v. The Honorable Robert Koffman, 815 S.W.2d 484 (Mo.App.1991), decided concurrently herewith. For the reasons fully set forth in said case, the writ herein is made absolute.

ULRICH, J., concurs.

LOWENSTEIN, C.J., dissents in separate opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FENNER, Judge.

Relator, Scott Albers, is the Public Defender for the 18th Judicial Circuit. In this action, Albers seeks to prohibit respondent, The Honorable Robert L. Koffman, from carrying out the court’s order that Albers, in his capacity as Public Defender, represent a Frank Williams in a civil contempt proceeding arising from alleged non-payment of child support. [487]*487This case presents an identical issue based upon the same facts as were presented in In Re Scott Albers v. The Honorable Robert Koffman, 815 S.W.2d 484 (Mo.App.1991), decided concurrently herewith. For the reasons fully set forth in said case, the writ herein is made absolute.

ULRICH, J., concurs.

LOWENSTEIN, C.J., dissents in separate opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

815 S.W.2d 486, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1446, 1991 WL 179410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albers-v-koffman-moctapp-1991.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack