State ex rel. Sterling v. Long

719 S.W.2d 455, 1986 Mo. LEXIS 342
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided November 18, 1986·No. No. 68031·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

BILLINGS, Judge.

The only issue for resolution in this prohibition proceeding is whether the trial court can compel, under penalty of contempt, a public defender to represent an alleged indigent father in a civil contempt proceeding for failure to pay child support.

For the reasons expressed by this Court in State ex rel. Marshall v. Blaeuer, 709 S.W.2d 111 (Mo. banc 1986), the respondent judge had no authority to compel the State to expend public funds, by the appointment of a public defender, to defend the parent in the civil contempt proceeding. See also State ex rel. Shaw v. Provaznik, 708 S.W.2d 337 (Mo.App.1986).

Writ made absolute.

HIGGINS, C.J., and DONNELLY, WEL-LIVER, ROBERTSON and RENDLEN, JJ., concur. BLACKMAR, J., dissents in separate opinion filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Sterling v. Long, 719 S.W.2d 455, 1986 Mo. LEXIS 342 (Mo. 1986).

719 S.W.2d 455 (State ex rel. Sterling v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Family Support Division-Child Support Enforcement v. Lane
313 S.W.3d 182 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)
Albers v. Koffman
815 S.W.2d 484 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1991)