State ex rel. Sterling v. Long
This text of 719 S.W.2d 455 (State ex rel. Sterling v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The only issue for resolution in this prohibition proceeding is whether the trial court can compel, under penalty of contempt, a public defender to represent an alleged indigent father in a civil contempt proceeding for failure to pay child support.
For the reasons expressed by this Court in State ex rel. Marshall v. Blaeuer, 709 S.W.2d 111 (Mo. banc 1986), the respondent judge had no authority to compel the State to expend public funds, by the appointment of a public defender, to defend the parent in the civil contempt proceeding. See also State ex rel. Shaw v. Provaznik, 708 S.W.2d 337 (Mo.App.1986).
Writ made absolute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
719 S.W.2d 455, 1986 Mo. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sterling-v-long-mo-1986.