Alabama Northern Ry. Co. v. Hoge

93 So. 517, 207 Ala. 692, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 219
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 30, 1922·No. 7 Div. 339.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff was employed by the defendant company for one year at $150 a month, and that, although he held himself in readiness to do his work, defendant failed or refused to furnish the work during the last two months of the term, to plaintiff’s damage in the sum of $300.

The case was tried before the court without a jury, and we think the evidence fairly supports the finding that plaintiff was employed as president of the company for a year at a salary of $150 a month, and that he was discharged without fault on his part; and that, having held himself in readiness to do his work during April and May, 1921, he was entitled to recover the stipulated salary for those months. Strauss v. Meertief, 64 Ala. 299, 38 Am. Rep. 8.

The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON. C. J., and THOMAS and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alabama Northern Ry. Co. v. Hoge, 93 So. 517, 207 Ala. 692, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 219 (Ala. 1922).

93 So. 517 (Alabama Northern Ry. Co. v. Hoge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Barnhill
108 So. 456 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Navco Hardwood Co. v. Bass
108 So. 452 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Alabama Northern Ry. Co. v. Hoge
93 So. 924 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)