Alabama Northern Ry. Co. v. Hoge

Alabama Court of Appeals

Alabama Northern Ry. Co. v. Hoge

93 So. 924, 98 So. 924, 18 Ala. App. 680

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 24, 1922

Docket7 Div. 780.

StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 924 (Alabama Northern Ry. Co. v. Hoge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alabama Northern Ry. Co. v. Hoge, 93 So. 924, 98 So. 924, 18 Ala. App. 680 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

There were two cases between these parties both of which were tried jointly in the circuit court of Clay county. Separate judgments, however, were rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the court below, from which judgments an appeal was taken in each case to this court, and both appeals were submitted on briefs on May 30, 1922. In the division of cases June 15, 1922, between this court and the Supreme Court, one of these records was transferred by agreement to the Supreme Court. On June 30, 1922, the Supreme Court (through Somerville, J.) handed down an opinion in the case transferred to it, in which the judgment of the lower court appealed from was affirmed. Ala. Northern Ry. Co. v. Hoge (Ala. Sup.) 93 South. 517. 1 On the submission of these cases in this court, it was agreed and understood that the two cases be submitted together, and that the decision in one case should govern in the other. It follows, therefore, that the judgment appealed from in the instant case must be affirmed, on thp authority of Alabama Northern Railway Co. v. S. C. Hoge, 207 Ala. 692, 93 South. 517. Affirmed.

1

207 Ala. 692.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

There were two cases between these parties both of which were tried jointly in the circuit court of Clay county. Separate judgments, however, were rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the court below, from which judgments an appeal was taken in each case to this court, and both appeals were submitted on briefs on May 30, 1922. In the division of cases June 15, 1922, between this court and the Supreme Court, one of these records was transferred by agreement to the Supreme Court. On June 30, 1922, the Supreme Court (through Somerville, J.) handed down an opinion in the case transferred to it, in which the judgment of the lower court appealed from was affirmed. Ala. Northern Ry. Co. v. Hoge (Ala. Sup.) 93 South. 517. 1 On the submission of these cases in this court, it was agreed and understood that the two cases be submitted together, and that the decision in one case should govern in the other. It follows, therefore, that the judgment appealed from in the instant case must be affirmed, on thp authority of Alabama Northern Railway Co. v. S. C. Hoge, 207 Ala. 692, 93 South. 517. Affirmed.

1

207 Ala. 692.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 So. 924, 98 So. 924, 18 Ala. App. 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-northern-ry-co-v-hoge-alactapp-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack