Al-Haj v. Singer

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 3, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-03135-LJL·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NAGIBE AL-HAJ, Plaintiff, 19-CV-3135 (CM) -against- ORDERTO AMEND DR. SINGER, et al., Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff, appearing pro se, brings this civil rights action alleging that Defendants violated his rights at the Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center (KPFC). By order dated January 6, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is,in forma pauperis.For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiff 30 days’ leave to file an amended complaint.The Court assumes familiarity with the procedural history of this case. STANDARD OF REVIEW The Court must dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint, or portion thereof, that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B); see Livingston v. Adirondack Beverage Co., 141 F.3d 434, 437 (2d Cir. 1998). The Court must also dismiss a complaint when the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.SeeFed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). While the law mandates dismissal on any of these grounds, the Court is obliged to construe pro sepleadings liberally, Harris v. Mills, 572 F.3d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 2009), and interpret them to raise the “strongest [claims] that they suggest,” Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474-75 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) (emphasis in original). Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a complaint to make a short and plain statement showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. A complaint states a claim for relief if the claim is plausible. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009) (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). To review a complaint for plausibility, theCourt accepts all well-pleaded factual allegations as true and draws all reasonable inferences in the pleader’s

favor. Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678-79 (citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555). But the Court need not accept “[t]hreadbarerecitals of the elements of a cause of action,” which are essentially legal conclusions. Id. at 678 (citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555).After separating legal conclusions from well-pleaded factual allegations, the court must determine whether those facts make it plausible –not merely possible –that the pleader is entitled to relief. Id. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges the following facts: on March 21, 2019, at 11:19 a.m., Plaintiff “fell down 3 time[s] from the bed [and] broke [his] back [since] then.” (ECF No. 1 at 3.) He also alleges that from “Sept. 2018 until 2019,” he has “been disrespected[ed] from the house so they took [him] to 3 east from 2 east.” (Id.) He names as defendants in the caption of the complaint:

(1) Doctors Singer, Musa, Sakaleg, and Klein; (2) “Vincent Nurses”; (3) “Senior Taylor”; and “all SHTA [Security Hospital Treatment Assistant] and prisoners.” Plaintiff acknowledges that he is “su[i]ing] 2 east all of [the] t[]ime.” (Id.) In fact, Plaintiff has filed several actions arising out of events that occurred at KPFC. See, e.g.,Al-Haj v. Kirby Forensic Psych. Ctr., ECF 1:19-CV-6072,29 (pending); Al-Haj v.K.P.F.C. -O.M.H., ECF 1:19-CV-3971, 5 (dismissed as duplicative of this action); Al-Haj v. Kirby Forensic Psych. Ctr., ECF 1:18-CV-11595, 5 (dismissed for failure to state a claim); Al-Haj v. OMH State of N.Y., ECF 1:18-CV-5505, 74 (same); Al-Haj v. K.F.P.C., ECF 1:18-CV-2486, 9 (dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction); Al-Haj v. Thomas, ECF 1:17-CV-8798, 9 (same); Al-Haj v. Friedfertig, ECF 1:17-CV-9652, 7 (same); Al-Haj v. Kirby Forensic Psych. Ctr., ECF 1:15-CV- 0248, 61 (dismissed upon settlement in the amount of $2,500.00). None one of these pending and prior actions concerns the same events giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims here. DISCUSSION Because Plaintiff names individuals who are employed by the State of New York, the

Court construes the complaint as brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. To state a claim under § 1983, Plaintiff must allege both that: (1) a right secured bythe Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) the right was violated by a person acting under the color of state law, or a “state actor.” West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48-49 (1988).Under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff also must makeshort and plain statements showing that he is entitled to relief. Plaintiff does not state a claim showing that he is entitled to relief because he fails to allegeany facts suggesting that the named defendants were involved personally in violating any right. Moreover, the facts alleged do not suggest that any of Plaintiff’s federal rights were violated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Al-Haj v. Singer, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Al-Haj v. Singer (Al-Haj v. Singer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
West v. Atkins
487 U.S. 42 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Hill v. Curcione
657 F.3d 116 (Second Circuit, 2011)
Harris v. Mills
572 F.3d 66 (Second Circuit, 2009)
Salahuddin v. Cuomo
861 F.2d 40 (Second Circuit, 1988)