Al-Haj v. Singer

S.D. New York

Al-Haj v. Singer

DecidedMarch 15, 2021

Docket1:19-cv-03135-LJL

StatusUnknown

This text of Al-Haj v. Singer (Al-Haj v. Singer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Al-Haj v. Singer, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: ee DR DATE FILED:_ 3/15/2021 NAGIBE AL-HAJ, : Plaintiff, : : 19-cv-3135 (LJL) -V- : : ORDER DR. SINGER, DR. SAKALEG, DR. KLEIN, NURSE : VINCENT, DR. CRISTINA MUSAT, AND SONTE : TAYLOR, : Defendants. :

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: By letter dated March 1, 2021, Plaintiff requested that the Court appoint counsel to represent him in this case, along with another related case also pending before this Court (No. 19-6072). A district court has “broad discretion” to decide whether to seek pro bono representation for a civil litigant. Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 60 (2d Cir. 1986). However, “a court has no authority to ‘appoint’ counsel, but instead, may only ‘request’ that an attorney volunteer to represent a litigant.” Vann v. Sudranski, 2020 WL 8679706, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 8, 2020) (quoting Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court for the S. Dist. of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 301-10 (1989)). Because “[v]olunteer lawyer time is a precious commodity,” Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877 F.2d 170, 172-73 (2d Cir. 1989), “[c]lourts must request the services of pro bono counsel sparingly, and with reference to public benefit.” Vann, 2020 WL 8679706, at *1. The Second Circuit has set forth factors to guide a court’s discretion to appoint counsel to represent an indigent civil litigant under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in Hodge. Under Hodge, the first question 1s whether the litigant’s claims “seems likely to be of substance.” Hodge, 802 F.2d at 61. If the court determines that the claims have substance, the court should consider other factors including: “plaintiff's ability to obtain representation independently, and his ability to handle the case without assistance in the light of the required factual investigation, the complexity of the legal issues, and the need for expertly conducted cross-examination to test veracity.” Cooper, 877 F.2d at 172. Plaintiff has not made such a showing at this time and the Court cannot determine at this point that the claim has merit. Plaintiff may seek assistance from the New York Legal Aid Group Legal Clinic for Pro Se Litigants. The Clinic can be reached at (212) 659-6190 or at their website: https://www.nylag.org/pro-se-clinic/. Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: ee DR DATE FILED:_ 3/15/2021 NAGIBE AL-HAJ, : Plaintiff, : : 19-cv-3135 (LJL) -V- : : ORDER DR. SINGER, DR. SAKALEG, DR. KLEIN, NURSE : VINCENT, DR. CRISTINA MUSAT, AND SONTE : TAYLOR, : Defendants. :

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: By letter dated March 1, 2021, Plaintiff requested that the Court appoint counsel to represent him in this case, along with another related case also pending before this Court (No. 19-6072). A district court has “broad discretion” to decide whether to seek pro bono representation for a civil litigant. Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 60 (2d Cir. 1986). However, “a court has no authority to ‘appoint’ counsel, but instead, may only ‘request’ that an attorney volunteer to represent a litigant.” Vann v. Sudranski, 2020 WL 8679706, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 8, 2020) (quoting Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court for the S. Dist. of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 301-10 (1989)). Because “[v]olunteer lawyer time is a precious commodity,” Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877 F.2d 170, 172-73 (2d Cir. 1989), “[c]lourts must request the services of pro bono counsel sparingly, and with reference to public benefit.” Vann, 2020 WL 8679706, at *1. The Second Circuit has set forth factors to guide a court’s discretion to appoint counsel to represent an indigent civil litigant under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in Hodge. Under Hodge, the first question 1s whether the litigant’s claims “seems likely to be of substance.” Hodge, 802 F.2d at 61. If the court determines that the claims have substance, the court should consider other factors including: “plaintiff's ability to obtain representation independently, and his ability to handle the case without assistance in the light of the required factual investigation, the complexity of the legal issues, and the need for expertly conducted cross-examination to test veracity.” Cooper, 877 F.2d at 172. Plaintiff has not made such a showing at this time and the Court cannot determine at this point that the claim has merit. Plaintiff may seek assistance from the New York Legal Aid Group Legal Clinic for Pro Se Litigants. The Clinic can be reached at (212) 659-6190 or at their website: https://www.nylag.org/pro-se-clinic/. Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Al-Haj v. Singer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/al-haj-v-singer-nysd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack