Akron (City) v. Butler

140 N.E. 324, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 8, 108 Ohio St. 122, 1923 Ohio LEXIS 227
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 12, 1923
DocketNo. 17702
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 140 N.E. 324 (Akron (City) v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akron (City) v. Butler, 140 N.E. 324, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 8, 108 Ohio St. 122, 1923 Ohio LEXIS 227 (Ohio 1923).

Opinion

ROBINSON, J.

Epitomized Opinion

First Publication of this Opinion

Butler was struck and injured by a truck [9]*9belonging to the City of Akron and operated by the street cleaning department. At the time of the accident Butler was returning from a trip to the railway station, where he had to deliver a broom shell to be shipped “for a sample.” Butler recovered judgment in the Common Pleas, which judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. The City brought error proceedings in the Supreme Court. Held:

Attorneys — H. M.. Hagelbarger, Law Director, Akron, and C. T. Moore, Columbus, for City; Prank N. Sweitzer, Canton, and Musser, Kimber & Huffman, Akron, for Butler.

The truck was under the management of department whose duties with reference to street cleaning come within the general classification of governmental functions, but whose duties with reference to parks and public property come within the general classification of proprietary functions. The only evidence as to the mission of the truck being that the broom shell was to be shipped “for a sample,” no inference as to which of the two functions the city was engaged in, can reasonably be made. The purpose of the shipment was decisive. Plaintiff thus failed to furnish any proof of the liability of the city. Judgment was reversed and judgment entered for city.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Guardianship of Kindell
2022 Ohio 3456 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)
Doe v. Contemporary Servs. Corp.
2019 Ohio 635 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
Huntington National Bank v. Toland
594 N.E.2d 1103 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1991)
Witt v. Ward
573 N.E.2d 201 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1989)
Hack v. City of Salem
174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 383 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1963)
Hart v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
188 N.E.2d 817 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1963)
Broughton v. City of Cleveland
167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 29 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1957)
Wolf v. City of Columbus
129 N.E.2d 309 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1954)
Zangerle v. City of Cleveland
61 N.E.2d 720 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1945)
Larson v. Cleveland Railway Co.
50 N.E.2d 163 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1943)
Davis v. Charles Shutrump & Sons Co.
42 N.E.2d 663 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1942)
Niblock v. Salt Lake City
111 P.2d 800 (Utah Supreme Court, 1941)
Matthews v. City of Detroit
289 N.W. 115 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1939)
Villalpando v. City of Cheyenne
65 P.2d 1109 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1937)
Selden v. City of Cuyahoga Falls
6 N.E.2d 976 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1937)
City of Mingo Junction v. Sheline
196 N.E. 897 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1935)
Johnson v. Board of County Road Commissioners
235 N.W. 221 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1931)
City of Hamilton v. Dilley
166 N.E. 147 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1928)
Gorman v. City of Cleveland
159 N.E. 136 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1927)
City of Portsmouth v. Mitchell Manufacturing Co.
148 N.E. 846 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 N.E. 324, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 8, 108 Ohio St. 122, 1923 Ohio LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akron-city-v-butler-ohio-1923.