Akridge v. Barres
321 A.2d 230, 65 N.J. 266, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 179, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 9673
Opinions
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Akridge v. Barres, 321 A.2d 230, 65 N.J. 266, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 179, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 9673 (N.J. 1974).
321 A.2d 230 (Akridge v. Barres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Hall v. Mayor & Director of Public Safety of Pennsauken
406 A.2d 317 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Board of Selectmen of Framingham v. Civil Service Commission
387 N.E.2d 1198 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1979)
McClung v. Board of Education
346 N.E.2d 691 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1976)
Francis Muscare v. Robert J. Quinn, Individually and as Commissioner, Chicago Fire Dept.
520 F.2d 1212 (Seventh Circuit, 1975)
Marshall v. District of Columbia
392 F. Supp. 1012 (District of Columbia, 1975)
Akridge v. Barres
321 A.2d 230 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1974)