Manco v. Town of Irvington
313 A.2d 204, 64 N.J. 142, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 203, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 9193
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Manco v. Town of Irvington, reported at 126 N. J. Super. 148. (App. Div. 1973)
For affirmance—Acting Chief Justice Jacobs, Justices Hall, Sullivan, Pashman and Clieeobd and Judges Coneoed and Collesteb—7.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manco v. Town of Irvington, 313 A.2d 204, 64 N.J. 142, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 203, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 9193 (N.J. 1974).
313 A.2d 204 (Manco v. Town of Irvington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Francis Muscare v. Robert J. Quinn, Individually and as Commissioner, Chicago Fire Dept.
520 F.2d 1212 (Seventh Circuit, 1975)
Neil Kamerling v. John T. O'hagan, Fire Commissioner, City of New York
512 F.2d 443 (Second Circuit, 1975)
Michini v. Rizzo
379 F. Supp. 837 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1974)
Akridge v. Barres
321 A.2d 230 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1974)