Aguinaldo Zamora v. New Braunfels Independent School District

519 F.2d 1084
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 5, 1975
Docket73-2999
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 519 F.2d 1084 (Aguinaldo Zamora v. New Braunfels Independent School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aguinaldo Zamora v. New Braunfels Independent School District, 519 F.2d 1084 (5th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case is controlled by three recent decisions of this Court: Morales v. Shannon, 5 Cir. 1975, 516 F.2d 411, United States v. Midland Independent School District, 5 Cir. 1975, 519 F.2d 60 and Tasby v. Estes, 5 Cir. 1975, 517 F.2d 92. The district court did not have the benefit of these cases which were decided long after the court’s judgment approving the desegregation plan for the New Braunsfel Independent School District (NBISD). .. .

The record demonstrates that the NBISD has a history of deliberately segregating Chicanos going back to 1910 when the first Mexican school was built. The existing isolation of Mexican-American students was a result of NBISD’s long-standing segregatory intent.

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded for reconsideration in the light of the three recent decisions of this Court referred to in this opinion. The appropriate remedy should also be considered in light of the following cases: Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colorado, 1973, 413 U.S. 189, 98 S.Ct. 2686, 37 L.Ed.2d 548; United States v. Texas Education Agency, Austin Independent School District, 5 Cir. 1972, 467 F.2d 848 (motion for clarification denied 5 Cir. 1973, 470 F.2d 1001); Cisneros v. Corpus Christi Independent School District, 5 Cir. 1972, 467 F.2d 142, cert. denied 1973, 413 U.S. 920, 93 S.Ct. 3053, 37 L.Ed.2d 1041, reh. denied 1973, 414 U.S. 881, 94 S.Ct. 31, 38 L.Ed.2d 129. The district court should require the defendants to come forward as promptly as practicable with a constitutionally acceptable desegregation plan or fashion one of its own.

The case is ordered reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. State of Tex.
498 F. Supp. 1356 (E.D. Texas, 1980)
United States v. Texas
498 F. Supp. 1356 (E.D. Texas, 1980)
Alvarado v. El Paso Independent School District
426 F. Supp. 575 (W.D. Texas, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 F.2d 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aguinaldo-zamora-v-new-braunfels-independent-school-district-ca5-1975.