Agry v. Young
11 Mass. 220
Opinion
The practice was formerly to declare in this class of actions in case ; but a decision is recollected by us, that trespass vi et armis was the only proper action, and we must adhere to it.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Agry v. Young, 11 Mass. 220 (Mass. 1814).
11 Mass. 220 (Agry v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brewer v. Casey
82 N.E. 45 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Palmer v. Lawrence
6 Lans. 282 (New York Supreme Court, 1872)
Crandall v. James Others
6 R.I. 144 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1859)
Walker v. Cochran
8 N.H. 166 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1835)
Freeman v. Kenney
32 Mass. 44 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1833)
Taft v. Metcalf
28 Mass. 456 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1831)
Brown v. Feeter
7 Wend. 301 (New York Supreme Court, 1831)
Thames Manufacturing Co. v. Lathrop
7 Conn. 550 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1829)