Agry v. Young
This text of 11 Mass. 220 (Agry v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The practice was formerly to declare in this class of actions in case ; but a decision is recollected by us, that trespass vi et armis was the only proper action, and we must adhere to it.
Judgment arrested.
Coburn vs. Richardson, 16 Mass. Rep. 213. — Pease vs. Whitney, 5 Mass. Rep. 380. — Little vs. Greenleaf & Al. 7 Mass. Rep. 236. — 1 Chitty, 7th ed. 209. — And sec Colman & Al. vs. Anderson, 10 Mass. Rep. 120, n.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Mass. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agry-v-young-mass-1814.