Agry v. Young

11 Mass. 220
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 15, 1814
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 11 Mass. 220 (Agry v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Agry v. Young, 11 Mass. 220 (Mass. 1814).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The practice was formerly to declare in this class of actions in case ; but a decision is recollected by us, that trespass vi et armis was the only proper action, and we must adhere to it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brewer v. Casey
82 N.E. 45 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Palmer v. Lawrence
6 Lans. 282 (New York Supreme Court, 1872)
Crandall v. James Others
6 R.I. 144 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1859)
Walker v. Cochran
8 N.H. 166 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1835)
Freeman v. Kenney
32 Mass. 44 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1833)
Taft v. Metcalf
28 Mass. 456 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1831)
Brown v. Feeter
7 Wend. 301 (New York Supreme Court, 1831)
Thames Manufacturing Co. v. Lathrop
7 Conn. 550 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1829)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Mass. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agry-v-young-mass-1814.