Coburn v. Richardson

16 Mass. 213
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 15, 1819·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Parker, C. J.

The only question in this case is, whether the land of Richardson, the defendant in error, lying in another town than that in which he dwells, is exempted from taxation by force of the statute. We suggested our opinion upon this question, in the last action of Turner vs. The Parish of Burlington. Nor do we see occasion to alter the opinion then thrown out. We cannot limit the exemption to a tax on the person. Indeed, * the [ * 215 ] tax upon the land in another town is as much a tax upon the person, as a tax upon the land in the town in which the owner dwells.

[182]*182Numerous are the inconveniences, and great is the injustice which may flow from this statute; But it is for the legislature alone to determine whether these are or are not counterbalanced by any great public good, which may be expected to be produced by it.

Judgment affirmed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coburn v. Richardson, 16 Mass. 213 (Mass. 1819).

16 Mass. 213 (Coburn v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Youngblood v. Sexton
32 Mich. 406 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1875)
Loomis v. Spencer
1 Ohio St. (N.S.) 153 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1853)
Sumner v. First Parish
21 Mass. 361 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1826)
Holbrook v. Holbrook
18 Mass. 248 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1822)
Agry v. Young
11 Mass. 220 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1814)